 |
| Ain't afraid of no ghost |
A Review of Ghostbusters by Nick Olszyk
MPAA Rating, PG-13
USCCB Rating, A-III
Reel Rating, Three Reels
It has been
a bit perplexing to watch and endure the gargantuan amount of hype surrounding
the second go-around for Ghostbusters, most of it negative, some it
truly vitriol. It was all for naught. Ghostbusters is mostly
funny, not too edgy, and always entertaining. This is a pretty good description
of the original, and perhaps that’s all some fans had wanted.
Dr. Erin Gilbert (Kristen
Wiig) plays a brilliant particle physicist hoping for tenure at a prestigious
university. Her hopes are dashed, however, when she discovers that her old lab
partner, Dr. Abby Yates (Melissa McCarthy), is selling copies online of a
dubious book on the paranormal they co-wrote years ago. Soon jobless, she joins
Abby, engineer/quartermaster Jillian Holtzmann (Kate McKinnon), and street-wise
Subway worker Patty (Leslie Jones) on a mission to discover why ghosts are
suddenly popping up all over New York City.
For such a silly, slender
premise, this movie generated some serious internet chatter. (Perhaps that
really shouldn’t be surprising.) As of this writing, its trailer is the tenth
most disliked video on YouTube, and the only movie trailer in the Top 30. Some
criticism has focused on feminism and gender-bending, reacting to the casting
of all females in previously male roles. This response is understandable in the
context of a society in which gender theory has gone completely and wildly
awry. Yet, in this instance, there is nothing about the characters that demands
a specific gender and there are no serious romantic themes or storylines.
Despite the cast, there was a significant lack of gender-related humor—an
oddity for a Paul Feig film. Another possibility was burnout over an endless
amount of sequels, spin-offs, remakes, and reboots. This is a better criticism
as Hollywood has been franchise crazy as of late, but even the most original
films depend on established storytelling patterns.
The most likely culprit is
nostalgia for the original 1984 Ghostbusters movie. Often, a
series is rebooted either because of poor reception for the original or because
a significant length of time has transpired since the first outing. Yet Ghostbusters was
a beloved classic that premiered only thirty years ago. It was nominated for
two Oscars, had rave reviews, topped the box office for five consecutive weeks,
and even was rated the 28thfunniest movie of all time by the American Film
Institute.
As a Millennial, I have a healthy
sense of distance that may put this criticism into better perspective. Both films
rely on the same sense of humor, created by SNL alums as an extended skit that
found comedy in a dumb idea. Both of these films also succeed under the same
parameters, and while they share a basic Universe, the jokes are completely
different. If one needs any more validation, the new Ghostbusters contains no
less than five cameos from original cast members. Sadly, the late Harold Ramis
and Rick Moranis are missing.
As a stand-alone film, Ghostbusters is
Paul Feig-lite. It has all his usual trademarks—Kristin Wigg, Melissa McCarthy,
scatological humor—but is his first PG-13 offering. It’s funny but restrained.
Especially good are McKinnon as a nerdy Gilligan type and Chris Hemsworth as
Kevin, the objective beefcake yet incredibly stupid receptionist. Who knew Thor
had such good comedy chops!
As a theologian, I suppose I
should say something about the nature of ghosts, evil, and the paranormal. But
let’s face it: Ghostbusters really doesn’t care. It’s a
childish romp through gadgets and slime, and a pretty good one at that. In the
end all the worry was much ado about nothing, and if you are a scholar of
Shakespeare, you’ll find that joke really funny.
This article first appeared in Catholic World Report on July 28th, 2016.
Comments
Post a Comment