Aaron Doesn’t Love Lucy

 

Kidman and Bardem as the title characters
Aaron Doesn’t Love Lucy

A Review of Being the Ricardos by Nick Olszyk

 

Distribution Service: Amazon Prime

Year: 2021

MPAA Rating, R

USCCB Rating, A-III

Reel Rating, Two Reels            

 

            There are some Hollywood artists who are so distinctive they create their own genre. Aaron Sorkin is such an artist. Starting with Sports Night, perfected in The West Wing, then continued through a series of successful films like The Social Network and Moneyball, his works feature fast, witty dialogue often through quick movement, underlined by great themes of politics, society, art, and all things human. Colloquially, this became known as “walk and talk.” Being the Ricardos is textbook example of this style; as such, it will inevitably be a great piece of craftmanship with top notch actors, subtle but hilarious dialogue, and brilliant directing – this time by Sorkin himself. Yet this entry feels…sadly empty. It speaks quicky and with great articulation but has little to say.

            Working on a similar timeline to The West Wing, Being the Ricardos takes place during a single week in the first season of I Love Lucy as titular actress Lucille Ball (Nicole Kidman) faces not one but two major crises. First, a prominent newscaster accuses her, at the height of the red scare, as being a Communist. Second, a tabloid accuses her husband Desi Arnez (Javier Bardem), and leading man of her show, of adultery. All this occurs while trying to carry out – from script to live production – an episode of America’s favorite television program. As expected, Sorkin weaves in and out of the three narratives, unsure if any will be resolved. Lucille stands front and center, calm and composed, although internally torn. Through a series of flashbacks, the audience learns of her unlikely rise to stardom which brought her to this precipice. Considering all the elements, it’s a miracle the show gets made, much less becomes a hit. Only she could have pulled it off.

            The first major problem that hits right from the beginning is the insane amount of ego at every turn. From Lucy to Desi to the showrunner to the writers to the reporters to the executives to the sponsors – everyone is pushing and climbing to the top with their own agenda. Of course, they are all incredibly talented. Lucy is one of the best physical comedians of all time, but she was also incredibly controlling. She sends her co-star a huge breakfast because she is “looking a little too good” compared to herself. Desi isn’t much better, fiercely loyal to Lucy but manhandling and threatening everyone else around him.

            This feeds into one of the worst trends in Hollywood right now: demythologizing America’s heroes. Desi and Lucille were the shining couple of the Golden Age of television: clean, honest, humble, and loving. Their comedy came from the fact that – unearth it all – there was a real Christian couple madly in love. They could joke about Ricky’s Cuban accent because the audience understood they weren’t racist. They could make fun of Framley’s “girl voice” because trangenderism was never even a thought. Being the Ricardos would have the audience believe this was all an act. Everyone swore, drank, cheated, and secretly despised every aspect of American culture. Modern cinematic portrayals thus must be crude and profane to be honest. Nothing can further from the truth. While everyone is a sinner, few pursue it as a profession. It is also far more creative to explain harsh realities with a modicum of decorum rather than brute force.

            The one true thematic element was Desi’s staunch anti-Communism, which made Lucille’s association unthinkable. In her younger years, before she met Desi, she registered as a Communist out of her love for the working class, at a time when its horrors were not well known. Desi’s father was a democratically elected mayor who fled Cuba when the Bolsheviks came and burned his family’s house to the ground, after senselessly slaughtering their animals. Communism only works as a theory, never a reality. Lucy gets off the hook in dramatic fashion after Desi employs J. Edgar Hoover to admit, live on television, that Lucille is not under investigation. Yet in this moment of triumph, Desi privately reveals he cheated on her, spoiling the victory.

            These dramatics are intriguing to watch, especially under the tutelage of such fine writing and acting, but nothing new is revealed. The film ends on a downer with a small subtitle stating that Lucille divorced Desi the day after their last show. Considering such information, what was the point? The Ricardos were fake, and your enjoyment of I Love Lucy was a farce? After the film, I watch several episodes, including the one featured in this production. I was amazed how well it has aged, how fresh, sincere, and funny it was. Instantly, I realized it wasn’t the Ricardos that were fake but the pretentious assumptions of Sorkin and modern Hollywood. Yes, there were troubles, but in his last days of lung cancer in the 1980s, Lucille visited Desi constantly. There was real love which created great art. I don’t sense any love on Sorkin’s part. Of course, everyone’s talking so fast, it’s hard to know.

Comments