Christmas Pageant Musical

 

“Christmas Pageant Musical”

A Review of Journey to Bethlehem by Nick Olszyk

 

Distribution Service: Theatrical

MPAA Rating, TV-PG

USCCB Rating, Not rated at the time of this review

Reel Rating, Three Reels            

 

            There have been many adaptations of the Nativity story (including a spec script written by yours truly), but this is the first large scale musical of this Sunday School classic. However, this is not a big budget extravaganza in tradition of Rogers and Hammerstein but rather a funky 2000s pop compilation in the tradition of High School Musical and A Week Away. It is the passion project of Adam Anders, best known as the music composer and producer for such Millennial hits as Glee, Camp Rock, and The Descendants – here getting his first taste as a writer and director as well as lyricist. Like these previous entries, Bethlehem is cheesy, silly, and incredibly fun. Also like these entries, it is mostly forgettable and certainly not much to ponder.

            The story should be a familiar one to any Western audience, although it has a distinctively postmodern flair. Mary and Joseph seemed to be ripped right from the main characters of Disney’s Aladdin. She is a well spoken and educated woman who feels oppressed by her family which is trying to marry her off to a “good man.” He is a sensitive and emotionally mature inventor who dreams of bigger things. They even meet in a marketplace and flirt while tossing an apple around. Played by rising starlets Fiona Palomo and Milo Manheim, they are both young, witty, and extremely attractive. Apparently, dental and skin care was better in 1st century Israel than expected. Their plans are further complicated by Gabriel’s annunciation, made less awesome by his clumsy allusion to a famous stormtrooper when he first appears. Joseph is hesitant to continue with the relationship but after a song and dance filled dream sequence agrees to take on his role. The rest of the story follows as one could predict.

            As a pop musical, the songs are enjoyable but aggressively unmemorable. The show begins with Mary’s sisters singing “Mary Getting Married,” a cute take on “Matchmaker” from Fiddler on the Roof than relies heavily on alliteration. Then there is an 80s power ballad on the way to Elizabeth where Mary bemoans her situation complete with circling helicopter shots and sudden winds through her dress. There is one good song in Journey to Bethlehem, and it’s the slimy villain expose “It’s Good to Be King.” As King Herod the Great, Antionio Banderas – the film’s one big name – milks his inner bad guy for all its worth while soldiers do the macarena behind him. It’s honestly the only song I remembered mere hours after the movie was over.

            This musical was clearly designed to entice Christian families, so its worth looking at its exegetical underpinnings, no matter how slim. While there are many deviations from scripture, there is nothing overtly offensive. At the same time, the filmmakers seem woefully ignorant of any long-standing traditions. Mary has two siblings, and her parents appear to be in their 40s. Joseph is young and has never been married. At least they got the wise men right, using their traditional names and even races, though gold is still viewed as far more valuable than frankincense or myrrh.

By far the most interesting character is Herod Antipas (Joel Smallbone). He seems to be in an entirely different film altogether – and perhaps a more compelling one. As a potential heir, he desperately wants to have his father’s approval. However, he also recognizes his father’s madness and poor leadership, singing a painful ode about the complexities of good governance. He even seems to be keenly in tune with the tender political balance between Rome and the Jewish people. This Rick Blaine character arc culminates in a scene so insane and absurd I would never reveal it here, but it’s alone worth the price of admission.

There are moments in Journey to Bethlehem so stupid even wisecracking robots wouldn’t find it entertaining. There are also scenes so tender and joyous even the harshest critics wouldn’t smile. This will not be a classic of the Biblical genre, but it deserves to be seen a noble attempt to make the story palatable even if it largely misses the mark. Also, again, the dancing in Herod’s throne room is hilarious, so there’s that.

Comments