The Pain of Two Fathers

Mack and a Special Guest
“The Pain of Two Fathers”
A Review of The Shack by Nick Olszyk

MPAA Rating, PG-13
Reel Rating, Three Reels            

            I first read The Shack soon after it reached its zenith of fame in 2009. While recognizing its flaws, I appreciated its honest attempt to struggle with serious and difficult theological concepts that are often ignored by post-modern society. Most of all, I was moved by its powerful message of love and forgiveness. In the eight years between then and now, marriage and parenting have radically shifted my worldview. Thus, I should not have been shocked when I experienced its recent film adaptation as an entirely different story. Yet I was shocked and must confess that more tears in those two hours than any of the other thousands of films I have seen. As a movie for mass audiences, The Shack tells a good story but occasionally loses its way. For me, it was a beautiful source of unexpected grace. Maybe it will be for you too.
            Mac (Sam Worthington) is an average Joe who’s past and present is marked by great tragedy. Abused by an alcoholic father, he nonetheless manages to carve out a normal, middle-class existence until his youngest daughter goes missing during a camping trip. Although her body was never found, the authorities discover an abandoned shack deep in the Oregon wilderness that contains significant evidence she was taken and murdered there. While still recovering from the loss months later, he receives a mysterious note in his mailbox:

            Mackenzie, it’s been awhile. I’ve missed you. I’ll be at the shack next weekend if you want to get together.” – Papa

Papa was his daughter’s nickname for God. Despite better judgement, he goes to the shack alone to face what he assumes will be the killer. To his amazement, the note actually is from God, who appears as three separate individuals, each representing a person of the Trinity. He spends the next few days discussing, debating, and even arguing with each of them on a range of subjects including freewill, salvation, damnation, forgiveness, the communion of saints, but most especially the problem of evil. It’s a lot to take in, but, for a film based on a book that’s 70% people sitting and talking to each other, largely succeeds in creating a compelling visual narrative.
            The greatest point of contention most have with The Shack is its portrayal of the Godhead. God the Father appears twice, first as an African-American woman (Octavia Spencer), then later as an elderly Native American man (Graham Greene). Jesus is the most traditional of the three, played by Israeli actor Aviv Alush, who not only looks like Jesus if he were an Abercrombie & Fitch model but even speaks Aramaic at times. As expected, the Holy Spirit is the most difficult and the most bizarre adaptation. The Shack portrays him as an Asian woman named Sarayu. Any attempt to demonstrate the Trinity is going to fall into all sorts of traps and smarter people than me can argue if this is Modalism, Tritheism, Partialism, or something of the author’s own invention. In the end, it’s really not all that problematic. Most biblical images of God are personification of individual divine attributes. God does not really have a “strong right arm,” but he is mighty. Both Spencer and Greene’s performances successfully translate God’s wisdom, kindness, and strength. This is an artistic interpretation, not a textbook of canon law.
            What is more problematic is some of the quick, throw away lines that exit God’s (or Gods’?) lips. When Sarayu explains life to Mac, she sounds more Buddhist than Christian, speaking high metaphors in a slowly, dreamlike manner. Worse still is Jesus, who claims that he “isn’t Christian” and “doesn’t care about religion” in a casual manner that would make Jeff Bethke cheer. Yet despite these occasional frustrations, it’s striking how orthodox and thus counter-cultural The Shack can be. Heaven, Hell, Sin, Penance, the Afterlife, and Redemption are all very real and must be faced with courage. There are tangible consequences to breaking God’s law and even a beautiful burial scene that suggests the importance of sacramental Christianity. It’s hard to place the theology of The Shack in any denominational camp, except to say that while it gets many things right, it also wants to stay relevant in a way that compromises its overall message.
            Where The Shack often fails in its theology, it succeeds wildly in its personal narrative of Mac’s faith journey. Mac is so angry at God for allowing his daughter to be killed that, even when face to face with the Almighty, he has no hesitation in venting his displeasure. Slowly but surely, God allows Mac to voice his petitions, then gives a response. God even gives Mac a chance to act as judge for the world, and quickly he realizes that, like Job, he could never fully understand the depth of God’s wisdom and love. He is then pushed beyond just accepting suffering and is commanded to forgive his daughter’s murderer, a task that Mac finds much harder. These scenes are quite powerful and serve as an important illustration of Christ’s command to “forgive seventy times seven.”
            Yet this was not the real reason I loved The Shack, and I must admit that my own personal situation colored my experience of the film. Just over a month ago, my wife had a miscarriage, and it was the most devastating thing that has ever happened to me. Like Mac, I blamed both God and myself for the loss. As the film progressed, he voiced the same pain on screen that I experienced but had largely ignored in a vain attempt to appear sane. The Shack allowed me to feel not only grief but also the loving presence of God. It was a tremendously cathartic and rewarding experience; while I doubt my heartache is gone, it no longer haunts my waking hours.
            The experience of art is largely subjective, changing based on the audience’s perspective. In the same way that the Bible contains a variety of genres, not all of which are physically literal, The Shack is not intended to be a theological treatise but a story of encouragement – more Tobit than Leviticus. This does not mean that it’s incorrect and even possibly heretical ideas should be ignored. Yet, it is true in its demonstration of the healing power of God’s love. I don’t think I will ever see The Shack again, but I will always remember it – just like I will always remember Francis, the child I never got to hold in my arms but trust will see again someday.

This article first appeared in Catholic World Report on March 11th, 2017