The Fog of Truth

Christian Bale, amazingly, as Dick Cheney

“The Fog of Truth”
A Review of Vice by Nick Olszyk

MPAA Rating, R
USCCB Rating, L
Reel Rating, Two Reels           

            Former low-brow comedy director Adam McKay rose to enormous success in 2015 with The Big Short, an abrasive and clever comedy about the 2008 financial crisis. With Vice, it appears he wished to return to that same magical well, but – like other sophomore efforts – the well has run dry. It may be that McKay was doomed from the start. He openly admits in the opening credits that there “was little info” about the inner life of former Vice President Dick Cheney (Christian Bale). Thus, the film feels fudged in some way, much like the repudiation of its subject.
            McKay begins with two turning points in Cheney’s life, separated by forty years. The first occurs in 1963 when he gets a DUI and a dressing down by his girlfriend and future wife Lynne (Amy Adams). The second unfolds in the first crucial hours after the 2nd plane hit the Twin Towers on September 11th, 2001. In both instances, Cheney was able to step back, look at the bigger picture, and view a crisis as an opportunity for action. The film then progresses chronologically, starting with his time as an intern to then Congressman Donald Rumsfeld (Steve Carell) where he learns the fine art of secrecy to eventually becoming perhaps the only Vice President who held real political power. When history thrusts America into its darkest hour since WWII, Cheney comes to believe that it is his duty to protect his citizens at any cost, even if that includes their own privacy, rights, freedoms, or opinions.
            The phrase “the fog of war” refers to how a lack of information regarding the enemy makes battle plans difficult to predict and often leads to unexpected loss of life. For Cheney, there is a similar “fog of truth” he learned while watching Nixon’s downfall close-up, launching to a career where information was closely guarded and almost immediately destroyed after use. Unfortunately for McKay, this problem seriously affects the film’s potency. The Big Short was famous for its short vignettes with celebrity cameos to explain complicated economic concepts. This worked well because 1) he had great source material in Michael Lewis’ book and 2) his audience needed these scenes because most people don’t understand Wall Street. In Vice, similar scenes – while humorous – are forced, disjointed, and confused due to a lack of factual evidence. The audience gets a sense that Cheney is working the system, but it’s so easy to see McKay’s handiwork that we don’t trust his analysis.
            It’s this “obvious handiwork” that is Vice’s great Achilles heel. Early on, McKay makes the assertion that cable news has an inherent bias to the right. While this may be true for Fox News, it completely ignores the bias to the left present in CNN and MSNBC programming. Vice has a painfully obvious blind spot to its own biased opinions; McKay’s distain for Cheney and right-wing policies is constantly evident. Consider how the single “good thing” Cheney does in the whole film is support his daughter’s homosexuality which is given an inordinate amount of screen time. McKay wants to pretend he is being fair, so he finds the one “progressive” element of Cheney’s personality and sells it hard.
            There’s one analogy that McKay especially wants to enforce: that Dick and Lynne are the modern day MacBeths. He is a quiet man of power and intrigue; she is the seductive voice that pushes him to do dark deeds. They even share a faux soliloquy while in bed together that ends in – gratefully ungraphic – sexual consummation. It’s hard to take seriously a message that is, well, a message and not an organic part of the story. It’s not always necessary for a film to compliment an audience’s beliefs and even healthy to engage opposing viewpoints, but it should always be honest about its intentions.
            The picture of Cheney that emerges from Vice is not an inherently evil monster but someone who was groomed early on for underhanded deeds, believed fiercely in his own worldview of protecting America, and was willing bend any rule – divine or secular – to achieve his goals. Ultimately, this led to a series of rash decisions, made for manipulative reasons, that landed us in an unjust and unsuccessful war and continues to plague our nation today.
            This picture may be partially correct, but again, it’s hard to trust the filmmakers. Pope St. John Paul II said his favorite bible verse was John 8:32:

            “And you will know the Truth, and the Truth will set you free.”

He recognized that the 21st century is still living in a quasi-Orwellian world dominated by a power struggle to enforce competing interpretations of the truth. McKay has not provided the audience with the necessary evidence to back up his opinion. He did succeed, however, in getting me interested in Cheney’s life, driving me to check out his autobiography from my local library to see his side of the story.


Comments