A movie star and his stunt double |
“A
Violent Love Letter to Hollywood”
A Review of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood by Nick
Olszyk
MPAA Rating, R
USCCB Rating, O
Reel Rating, Three Reels
Disclaimer: Spoilers
ahead.
It is rare that a movie is promoted for its
director rather than its stars. Once
Upon a Time in Hollywood is billed
as the 9th film by director Quentin Tarantino, and every film he
makes is a mini-event in the cinematic world. Famously a video rental store
clerk turned superstar filmmaker, Tarantino’s pictures frequently reference the
masterpieces of the past, so a movie set in the glory days of the studio system
was probably evitable. It has everything a former film student like me would
love: frequent cameos, obscure references to lingo of the trade, shut-outs events
of eras past, and simple joy in the artform. But, as evident by John Mulderig’s
review
for the USCCB, it is not everyone’s cup of tea.
Rick Dalton (Leonardo DeCaprio)
is veteran Western actor nearing the sunset of his career in 1969. While still
making enough to live in mansion on Cielo Drive, he has been taking smaller and
smaller parts for years and finds himself dreading the future. His only friend
in the world is former stuntman Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt), who is only too happy living
in a trailer behind a drive-in theater and helping Rick with his daily tasks,
especially acting as his impromptu chaffer after a sting of DUIs. While
attempting to salvage his career, Rick’s life becomes intertwined with the new
neighbors next door, director Roman Polaski and his wife Sharon Tate, as well
as a strange group of hippies living in the desert where he used to film a television
show. If you know anything about Hollywood, you can see where this is going.
Setting aside anything about the story, plot,
or moral implications of Tarantino’s fetish for obscene violence, Once Upon
a Time in Hollywood is a gorgeous film to experience. It some of the best atmospheric
elements of any film in the last ten years. The cinematography, music,
clothing, art design, and simple mannerisms of the performers drips with the
culture of late 1960s Los Angeles when everyone smoked, neon lit up restaurants,
miniskirts were hip, and you never know when a celebrity will walk by you in
the streets. The film is over two and a half hours and takes its sweet time,
lingering lovingly over finned cars and fringe jackets. Again, for a film geek
like me, it was better than catnip, but anyone with a passaging nostalgia for
the era will enjoy the craftmanship of filmmakers. My personal favorite homage
is a fight scene between Cliff and Bruce Lee on the set of The Green Hornet.
Peppered with humor, great dialogue, and silly action, it does not end the way
one might think.
Yet beneath the
glitz and glamour, there is trouble brewing. Perhaps no one summarized the
times better when historian Paul Johnson called 1968 “America’s suicide
attempt.” Embracing the sexual revolution and counter culture, many young people
turned their backs on traditional values in a vain attempt to find meaning.
Charles Mason manipulated these impulses to create a violent, sex driven cult,
leading to the infamous murder of Sharon Tate in her eighth month of pregnancy.
Tarantino acknowledges that these cultural changes killed off his beloved golden
age of cinema and much of what made America a moral superpower on the world
stage. Yet, he is not capable of admitting how this “innocent time” was itself
tainted. Polanski and Tate visit the Playboy mansion, which seems fun and
cheeky, but was a hotbed for infidelity and sexual assault. Rick himself is an
obvious alcoholic, but Cliff makes no attempt to help his addiction.
The last scene
is the most controversial, but given Tarantino’s love for revisionist history, it
should not be too surprising. Until the end, Hollywood was almost a
PG-13 movie. Sure, there was lots of swearing and smoking, but no sex or violence
whatsoever. The film ends on the night of Sharon Tate’s murder, but this time
the Mason clan shows up at Rick’s house. In the next ten minutes, Rick and
Cliff will kill the amateur murderers in the most tortuous, horrific ways
possible including, but not limited to, repeated head slamming, knife stabbing,
castration, drowning, and being burned alive with a WWII flame thrower. The
violence is hyperbolic and cartoonish, obviously meant to be cathartic. Yet
simply the imagery itself is enough to be morally debase. Yes, they are villains
to punished, but they are still people – brain washed cult members barely out
of their teens.
Until this
radical 180 turn, the film was immensely enjoyable. DeCaprio and Pitt have
never been better, and their onscreen friendship is genuinely heartwarming. Tarantino’s
attempt to save Hollywood from one of its worst chapters is understandable but
not at the expense of such extreme assaults on decency. As a piece of
entertainment, Hollywood succeeds wildly, but there isn’t really any
lesson to be learned.
This article first appeared in Catholic World Report on August 5th, 2019.
Comments
Post a Comment